Supreme Court asked to review case against border device searches

by Jeremy

The case against warrantless device searches at the border might soon face a crucial test. The ACLU and EFF have asked the Supreme Court to hear a challenge to Department of Homeland Security policies that allow the warrant- and suspicion-free searches at the airport and other entry points. The groups argued that an appeals court was mistaken in overturning a ruling that the investigations were unconstitutional, and that the Supreme Court needed to step in to protect travelers’

Fourth Amendment rights. The lawsuit was initially filed in September 2017 on behalf of passengers whose phones and laptops were searched without warrants or even accusations of wrongdoing. Border agents are searching for reasons that sometimes have nothing to do with crime, such as collecting info about a business partner or a journalist’s story source. It’s not sure how the Supreme Court will respond to the petition.

Suppose the ACLU and EFF win, though. In that case, they hope to force Homeland Security to “at least” limit searches to situations where there’s reasonable suspicion, if not required warrants, based on probable cause. Officers would have reduced access to information, but knowing your sensitive data is safe against surprise inspections, you could travel.

All products recommended by Engadget are selected by our editorial team, independent of our parent company. Some of our stories include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, we may earn an affiliate commission.

Related Posts

Leave a Comment